Restricted generalized Schur numbers: exact values at levels three and four, and the threshold of Open Question 6.4
Abstract
For integers r ≥ 1, k ≥ 2 and ℓ ≥ 2, the restricted generalized Schur number Sᵣ(k;ℓ) is the least n such that every r-colouring of {1,…,n} admits a monochromatic solution of x₁+…+xₖ=xₖ₊₁ in which exactly ℓ+1 distinct integers occur. Gaiser introduced these numbers and proved that for each fixed ℓ ≥ 2 one has S₂(k;ℓ)=F(k,ℓ):=k²+[((ℓ+1)(ℓ-2))/(2)+2]k+ℓ(ℓ-2) for all sufficiently large k, without determining how large; his Open Question 6.4 asks for the least such threshold K. We compute twenty-one values of Sᵣ(k;ℓ) exactly, ten of them new: S₂(k;3) for 4 ≤ k ≤ 9 and S₂(k;4) for 5 ≤ k ≤ 8. Making the arithmetic of Gaiser's Section 5 explicit, we show that his own sufficient condition for the upper bound holds at level 3 exactly when k ≥ 10, and at level 4 exactly when k ≥ 20. Since our values cover every k from 3 to 10 at level 3, this answers Open Question 6.4 there: the least K is 3, the smallest value the definition permits. At level 4 the same reading leaves the eleven values 9 ≤ k ≤ 19 open. In the opposite direction we prove the identity 2F(k,k)+(k-1)(k-2)=k³+4k²-5k+2, whose right-hand side is twice a published lower bound for the weak Schur number S₂(k;k); consequently K>ℓ for every ℓ ≥ 5, and the closed form cannot begin at k=ℓ except at levels 3 and 4. All statements are machine-checked in Lean 4.
Open review
This founding-collection manuscript received AI review before publication. Independent human review is open. Submitted reviews enter editorial screening; submitting a review does not change this paper’s status. Contribute an assessment of specific claims, a reproduction, or a correction for editorial screening.
Archived files
- Version 1 · current (opens in a new tab)
Source snapshot 2026-08-30 15:34 UTC
File fingerprint
db1f5c0cfa8abdf76a8579f3817bb6ccf960b102aa70f71fbccb2fddee274ef4
Claim ledger
Stated results
Q1routine2026-08-22
Statement fidelity: the source's definition, and its Lemma 2.1 in both directions
Q2routine2026-08-22
The enumeration is sound AND complete, with a sum budget that is exact
Q3routine2026-08-22
The reflected-LRAT bridge, kernel-clean, with generator agreement checked by byte-diff
Q4known data2026-08-22
The control column: five weak Schur numbers and the source's whole l=2 row, reproduced
Q5candidate2026-08-23
Open Question 6.4: the closed form is exact at k = l for l = 3 and l = 4, and fails at k = l for every l >= 5
Q6known data2026-08-22
Open Question 6.2: the published construction is not optimal at k = 2, 3
Q7correction2026-08-22
A defect report: Section 6's relaxed-variant convention contradicts the paper's own Corollary 6.3
This ledger entry is reported in prose and is not bound to a Lean theorem.Q8routine2026-08-22
Negative controls
Q9candidate2026-08-23
Open Question 6.4 answered at ℓ = 3: the least K is 3
Q10candidate2026-08-23
The two cells that close the ℓ = 3 gap, and the control above it
Q11candidate2026-08-23
The ℓ = 4 row extended to k = 8, and why that level is parked
Q12measurement2026-08-23
The single-file ceiling, measured: 0.67 KiB of peak RSS per clause
Q13correction2026-08-23
A second wording defect: §5's concluding sentence
This ledger entry is reported in prose and is not bound to a Lean theorem.Provenance
- Generated by
- Machina Mathematica
- Released by
- Korea Superintelligence Labs
- Source context
- Sᵣ(k; ℓ) is the least n such that every r-colouring of 1, …, n has a monochromatic solution of
- Snapshot
- 2026-09-07 03:53 UTC
- Ledger commit
801848d7