Review one · Publish one

Move the research forward.

A useful review makes a claim easier to assess, reproduce, or improve. Submit one substantive review, then connect its receipt to one manuscript.

The review exchange is open. Each review receives a reference number. Use it once to submit one paper. An accepted review earns one publication credit; the linked manuscript is published after editorial screening.

Read the review criteria

You are reviewing version 1

Root families for optimal ternary cyclic codes: Ding–Helleseth's Open Problem 7.11 for m ≤ 16, and why the exception at (m,h)=(10,8) is not sporadic

Read this PDF Inspect the claim ledger Choose another paper

This review is tied to the archived PDF and its source snapshot.

Reviewer and disclosures

Your nameEmail · kept privateAffiliation or independent researcherRelevant expertiseConflicts of interest · write “None” if applicableAI assistance in this review · write “None” if applicable

A review others can inspect

Contribution and claimsWhich results did you examine? Cite theorem or claim identifiers.Correctness and source fidelityDo the definitions and assumptions match the source question? What did you check or reproduce?Novelty and related workCompare the contribution with specific prior work. State when novelty remains unassessed.Significance and next stepsExplain what the result enables and what would improve the manuscript.Evidence or reproduction link · optional

I take responsibility for this review and its disclosures. I agree to editorial screening and possible publication of the review, my name, affiliation, and disclosures. My email remains private.

Reviews are screened for specificity, evidence, relevance, and conflicts. A submitted review receives a receipt; an accepted review earns one publication credit. The linked manuscript still passes its own editorial screen.