The Chow–Rimanić covering number Cₖ(2): exact values by degree window, and the optimal families
Abstract
Chow and Rimanić introduced a function-field analogue of the lonely runner conjecture: for a finite family F of nonzero polynomials over 𝔽_q one sets δ(F)=sup_αmin_(f ∈ F)nm(α f) and lets Cₖ(q) be the least size of a family with δ(F)<q⁻ᵏ; they conjectured Cₖ(q)=Qₖ(q)=1+q+…+qᵏ. Hu has recently refuted this at (q,k)=(2,3) with thirteen polynomials over 𝔽₂ found by a cross-entropy search, giving 9 ≤ C₃(2) ≤ 13<15, and asked for the exact value of C₃(2). We settle that question inside the degree window in which the counterexample lives: no twelve nonzero polynomials over 𝔽₂ of degree at most four have loneliness less than 2⁻³, so the thirteen are optimal among all speeds of degree at most four. We then classify the optimal families in that window: there are exactly three, they carry the same covering-multiplicity distribution, and coefficient reversal carries the published family to the second and fixes the third. For k=2 we compute the value restricted to degrees at most four and at most five and find the conjectured 7 in both — past the reach of the Chow–Rimanić small-degree theorem, which at q=2, k=2 reaches only degree two. Every lower bound is an exhaustive search whose branching rule is proved complete rather than assumed, and every result proved here is machine-checked in Lean 4; the two results taken from the literature are marked as such.
Open review
This founding-collection manuscript received AI review before publication. Independent human review is open. Submitted reviews enter editorial screening; submitting a review does not change this paper’s status. Contribute an assessment of specific claims, a reproduction, or a correction for editorial screening.
Archived files
- Version 1 · current (opens in a new tab)
Source snapshot 2026-08-30 15:34 UTC
File fingerprint
0c42fbe8368328384b8be941eeb7676c9aeb04bc6363e2e4d2de847b437fb00d
Claim ledger
Stated results
RC1routine2026-08-28
The covering model transcribed, and ambient independence of the covering property
RC2known data2026-08-28
The source's thirteen polynomials: the cover, the multiplicity table and the incidence count
RC3routine2026-08-28
A verified exact set-cover search: branch on an uncovered point over every kernel through it
RC4candidate2026-08-28
C₃(2) restricted to speeds of degree at most 4 is exactly 13 – the source's family is optimal in its own degree window
RC5routine2026-08-28
Negative controls: every one of the thirteen is essential, and Covers is not vacuous either way
RC6candidate2026-08-28
Exactly three minimum covering families in the degree window, one orbit of the reversal-substitution symmetry
RC7routine2026-08-28
C₁(2) restricted to degree at most 4 is 3 = Q₁(2)
RC8candidate2026-08-28
C₂(2) is still 7 = Q₂(2) at degree bounds 4 and 5 – past the Chow-Rimanic small-degree threshold
RC9known2026-08-28
The two windows a published theorem already decides: C₃^((D<=3))(2) = 15 and C₄^((D<=4))(2) = 31, and the uniqueness of the optimum at D <= 3
Provenance
- Generated by
- Machina Mathematica
- Released by
- Korea Superintelligence Labs
- Source context
- Source: arXiv:2608.18818v2, Xiyu Hu, *Lonely Runners over Function Fields: Quantized Phase–Riesz product*, v1 19 Aug 2026, v2 21 Aug 2026 (math.CO primary, cross-listed math.NT). The model is due to S. Chow and L. Rimanić, *Lonely runners in function fields*, Mathematika 65 (2019) 677–701, arXiv:1711.01207.
- Snapshot
- 2026-09-07 03:53 UTC
- Ledger commit
801848d7